Governor defends plan to open free school in Herefordshire

A SCHOOL governor has defended plans to open a new high school in Herefordshire after council leaders voiced their concerns it might not live up to expectations.

As previously reported by the Hereford Times, Chris Baird, assistant director of Herefordshire Council, and Councillor Graham Powell, cabinet member for education, say a new school will take pupils and money away from existing schools.

Councillor Chris Chappell went further to claim the proposed Robert Owen Vocational School would “decimate” education in the county.

But Jim Crane, chairman of governors for the Robert Owen school, says the initiative is good news for the future of Herefordshire.

He said it would give students more opportunity to study core subjects and a chance to study for a VocBac qualification which would then lead to apprenticeships.

“We have a wonderful opportunity here to offer our young people and their parents another choice for 14-19 education,” said Mr Crane.

“This school will provide a new style of learning, equipping students with the skills employers need.

“It will improve their prospects of employment or self-employment.

“Students will study in an environment which offers a different approach to the delivery of core academic subjects with a variety of vocational studies and the opportunity to study in the real world of work.”

After retiring from a senior management role at the Herefordshire College of Technology in 2001, Mr Crane led the EU-funded national Training and Vocational Education Initiative (TVEI).

“This was regarded as one of the most successful programmes nationally,” said Mr Crane, “with Herefordshire recruiting over 1,000 students between the ages of 14 and 16, until the funding came to an end.

“TVEI opened the way for the development for vocational diplomas at ages 14-plus and the Young Apprenticeship initiative, each of which flourished in Herefordshire schools and colleges, again until the demise of government funding.

“I believe this gives an indication of the need for specialised vocational education to complement core academic subjects.

“Young people in Herefordshire are now disadvantaged in that they cannot access this type of training.”

As a free school, the Robert Owen Vocational School – which secured Whitehall’s outline approval back in July but has yet to secure funding – would receive its money directly from central government, not the local authority.

But, as schools are funded per pupil, any students who leave existing schools to join the Robert Owen site, would result in that school losing money.

For information on the proposed school, the location of which has still not been revealed, visit robertowen school.co.uk.

Comments(3)

Ubique5740 says...
1:05pm Wed 2 Jan 13

I know nothing about modern education, time, children's education results and parents opinions will either make this a very popular school or one begging for pupils.

rogero says...
4:34pm Wed 2 Jan 13

Having taught in Vocational Education for 45 years (since 1967) it sounds to me as a brilliant scheme. I was one of the original founding members of the TVEI in the early 1980's in Widemarsh Street (£6m spent then). The UK needs a renewal of the manufacturing and other exporting industries to get the country growing. Over the 45 years I have been appalled in the last 20-25 years by the terrible lack of basic maths and grammar ability of children leaving school, cannot even string a few words together into a sentence with puncuation, and able to manipulate numbers, many don't even know which button to press on a simple calculator. My students in 1967 could do it all because then and in the 1950's we were taught "proper"! Get rid of the 'Smartboard' and get back to sitting pupils facing the teacher and be taught.
Well done Jim Crane, hope it goes well.

WYSIATI says...
7:44pm Wed 2 Jan 13

Methinks there are several issues in play here.

It seems irrefutable that if funding is per pupil and there are more than enough places for the pupils now then some institutions are going to lose both pupils and funding - and there's no question that that will make times hard for those and may do serious damage.

Then there's another question about proper provision of the sort of education that will do the pupils/students good and be useful for society.

No doubt we need proper investment in skills that suit people who are not academic and we need to support all sorts of perfectly respectable jobs that need technical skills.

Where do we stand and can we have a coordinated approach that does not set one school or college against another? Competition may work well for market stalls but might not be the best way to organise the education and future for our kids, county and country

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree