Herefordshire Council confirms meeting with Jed McCrory was to "explore" Hereford United ground leases

Ledbury Reporter: Tommy Agombar (left) and Jed McCrory sit together in the crowd at a Swindon Town match. Photograph: Swindon Advertiser. Tommy Agombar (left) and Jed McCrory sit together in the crowd at a Swindon Town match. Photograph: Swindon Advertiser.

A SENIOR officer of Herefordshire Council met with former Swindon Town chairman Jed McCrory in February to directly “explore” the leases on Hereford United’s Edgar Street stadium.

The meeting was set up at the request of former Hereford United chairman David Keyte.

In a statement the council confirmed that Mr McCrory met with one senior officer  to “explore” the terms and conditions of the leases on the ground.

As reported by the Hereford Times yesterday, Mr McCrory and Hereford United's new owner Tommy Agombar were involved in a company at Swindon Town called Seebeck 87.

Hereford United’s new manager Jon Taylor was the assistant boss at Banbury United, a club formerly owned by Mr McCrory.

Earlier this month, Swindon Town's ownership battle was settled after a High Court judge ruled chairman Lee Power's takeover was carried out properly.

Power and his Swinton Reds 20 firm took control of the club from Seebeck 87 company in December.

But Mr McCrory disputed the manner of the takeover and commenced legal action.

It was reported at the time that Mr McCrory said a £300,000 payment from Lee Power into Seebeck was used to pay off Mr Agombar and two others – forcing them out of the holding firm and paving the way for Mr Power to take a senior role.

The council is already under pressure to “come clean” on what it knew about Hereford United’s finances ahead of the ground leases being re-assigned.

As landlord to the ground, the council has ruled out an immediate scrutiny inquiry into the way the leases were re-assigned five years ago.

Cllr Sebastian Bowen, chairman of overview and scrutiny, has said that though such an inquiry is not on the committee’s agenda over the foreseeable future, there was scope a hearing “when the dust has settled.”

But frustration is festering on the council’s “backbenches” as to what the authority – or was told – about the club’s finances when it went into negotiation over the leases.

Cllr Jim Knipe, who raised the issue last year, backed a call from Cllr Jim Kenyon, to set up a scrutiny inquiry as soon as possible with the club’s fate now effectively lying with the High Court.

“It is important to establish whether a due diligence report was prepared on Hereford United before the leases were amended.  If it is proved that no such report was prepared to establish the financial position of the club, then the Council could be negligent in its fiduciary duty to the residents of Herefordshire,” said Cllr Knipe.

More needed to be made public about payment plans that were the basis of assurances made to the council by the clubs new owners, he said.

The High Court has given the club another three weeks of life to  arrange a voluntary agreement with its creditors.

Calls for an inquiry into the lease negotiations came in tandem with pressure on the council  to release a report into due diligence it carried out on Hereford United ahead  of leases being re-assigned five years ago.

The council’s Independent group, to which Cllr Knipe belongs, is pushing for the report to be made public amid doubt that it actually exists.

Independent leader Cllr Bob Matthews raised the issue of due diligence when group leaders were given an update on the council and the club last month.

At the time, Cllr Knipe said he was “disappointed and alarmed” that, on the evidence so far, the council failed to carry out carry out a due diligence examination to establish the club’s financial position before negotiations over the leases  began.

In a statement the council said it carried out the “appropriate level” of due diligence when restructuring the leases - as  it would with any existing long term tenant who was not a new entity.

The statement said the council was aware of the situation the club faced as was “endeavouring to help them where possible.”

While the council is the landlord of the Edgar Street ground, it does not have any direct control or involvement in the club and its decisions.

Two leases refer to redevelopment of the Meadow End and Blackfriars End and stipulate that any proceeds be re-invested in the ground and its facilities.

The council is considering a request by the new owners for a transfer of those leases to a holding company within their ownership. 

Around £65k in rent arrears, business rates and legal fees is owed to the council by the club.

As yet, no related repayments have been made desopte the council accepting assurances from the new owners that all outstanding monies will be paid up.

The council was not on the list of Hereford United’s creditors put to a High Court winding up hearing this week – and the council says it doesn’t know why not.

On Monday, the High Court adjourned a winding up order sought by United’s former manager Martin Foyle and gave the club another three weeks of life to put a Creditors Voluntary Agreement package in place.

In a statement the council said: “ We are unaware of why we may have been omitted from the creditor list during the recent winding up order meeting.”

Within the council there is a willingness to wait until the latest three week High Court deadline is up before taking further action over what is owed, so the authority will know where it stands.

As renegotiated, the leases on the ground continue to be held by the club.  If the club folds the leases would revert back to the council.

Assigning the Edgar Street leases – one for 75 years on the ground and terracing to the west, the other for 33 years for the stand and parking area to the east and both dating from 1982 - was one of the last big deals done by the former Hereford City Council.

During the late 1990s, with United facing severe financial problems, the leases were reassigned to property developers in return for a £1m capital injection into the club.  

The money was made available through two companies, the BS (Bristol Stadium) Group and Chelverton.

BS and Chelverton took equal ownership of a special purpose company called Formsole Ltd which made the investment and held the leases – as the tenant under both – with the club holding sub-leases.  

By August 2001, BS had sold its “loan” to Chelverton which ran into trouble little over a year later when control of the leases passed to Carillion Richardson.

United still owed £1m plus interest to Formsole which stayed solvent when Chelverton went into liquidation.  

The reassignment of the leases was supported by Herefordshire Council when it took control of the former city council’s affairs.

Getting the leases back was pitched as a political priority when the news broke in April 2010 that then United chairman Graham Turner and vice chairman Joan Fennessy were ready to sell their majority shareholding in the club.

The club began negotiations with Carillion Richardson for the return of the leases almost as soon as the Keyte-Russon takeover was completed in June that year.

That deal was done by December with the club paying £452,000 to secure the return of the leases and settle a £1,069,500 debt to Richardsons Developments, clearing the way for a new single lease and the development opportunities that could bring.

The deal was intended to offer the club security for the next 30 years and ensure future re-entry to the Football League - which requires a 25-year secured tenancy.

It also opened up opportunities for grant funding for any future development - £400,000 in the Conference and £750,000 in the Football League.

The council was ready to allow an extension to the new stadium lease of 250 years once development at either end was underway, with proceeds from the sale of development areas held in a joint escrow account.

That money was intended for the construction of two new stands - one at each end of the ground - and modernisation work on the existing stadium.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:09am Fri 11 Jul 14

yokelyokel says...

The hyenas are circling around the wounded animal (bull?).

Herefordshire Council could gain a lot of credibility and respect with a statement to the effect that they will not transfer the leases to anyone or anyone's company. That would shake out the people who are interested in running a football club at whatever level and the people who are only interested in land and property development.

The worrying thing is that this meeting to "explore" the leases, set up by Keyte, preceded Agombar etc taking over the club. What promises or hints were given by the senior officer (who exactly) to McCrory that meant that Keyte was able to offload to Agombar.

Is this a part of the timeline.
Keyte wants to get shot of the club and its debt
Keyte is able to get a senior council officer to meet McCrory to discuss the leases
Agombar, a business associate of McCrory, buys the club
Agombar asks for the leases to be transferred to his own company
Council is embarrassed by how much is found out about all the parties by the Hereford Times and, particularly, fans of the football team.
Lots of covering of backsides.
The hyenas are circling around the wounded animal (bull?). Herefordshire Council could gain a lot of credibility and respect with a statement to the effect that they will not transfer the leases to anyone or anyone's company. That would shake out the people who are interested in running a football club at whatever level and the people who are only interested in land and property development. The worrying thing is that this meeting to "explore" the leases, set up by Keyte, preceded Agombar etc taking over the club. What promises or hints were given by the senior officer (who exactly) to McCrory that meant that Keyte was able to offload to Agombar. Is this a part of the timeline. Keyte wants to get shot of the club and its debt Keyte is able to get a senior council officer to meet McCrory to discuss the leases Agombar, a business associate of McCrory, buys the club Agombar asks for the leases to be transferred to his own company Council is embarrassed by how much is found out about all the parties by the Hereford Times and, particularly, fans of the football team. Lots of covering of backsides. yokelyokel
  • Score: 11

11:31am Fri 11 Jul 14

dplcv37 says...

Don't you just love our council!!??

"Council could be negligent in its fiduciary duty to the residents of Herefordshire"

That statement just about sums them up. They are only ever looking after their own interests.
Don't you just love our council!!?? "Council could be negligent in its fiduciary duty to the residents of Herefordshire" That statement just about sums them up. They are only ever looking after their own interests. dplcv37
  • Score: 10

12:58pm Fri 11 Jul 14

littlewhitebull says...

Most supporters have expressed despair at what has happened to our club in the past few months - or even years.
At some of the latter matches I heard rumblings of what can only be described as extreme unease concerning some of the 'alleged shenanigans' that some supporters were supposed to be gleaning.
It now appears those few supporters were accurate in their fears.
As supporters, we have been treated with complete disdain.
We received promises that all would be well in the end. The most accurate news came not from the club chairman, but from the Hereford Times, and some supporters who were more 'in the know'.
Our previous manager (MF), players, ground staff, and many other staff members were receiving promises of payment that did not materialise.
All staff of the club and the supporters deserved to be told that good old saying used in court:: "I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."
In reality the staff and supporters have received nothing like the truth.
Most supporters have expressed despair at what has happened to our club in the past few months - or even years. At some of the latter matches I heard rumblings of what can only be described as extreme unease concerning some of the 'alleged shenanigans' that some supporters were supposed to be gleaning. It now appears those few supporters were accurate in their fears. As supporters, we have been treated with complete disdain. We received promises that all would be well in the end. The most accurate news came not from the club chairman, but from the Hereford Times, and some supporters who were more 'in the know'. Our previous manager (MF), players, ground staff, and many other staff members were receiving promises of payment that did not materialise. All staff of the club and the supporters deserved to be told that good old saying used in court:: "I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth." In reality the staff and supporters have received nothing like the truth. littlewhitebull
  • Score: 4

3:06pm Sun 13 Jul 14

jd1950 says...

I am afraid, but I think that this council has an agenda, just think how many houses it could build on this site, how much more of our money they could fritter away to make things possible, for whatever, and if you want truth don't expect it from a political point of view, when have these people ever done anything that is not in their own interest?
I am afraid, but I think that this council has an agenda, just think how many houses it could build on this site, how much more of our money they could fritter away to make things possible, for whatever, and if you want truth don't expect it from a political point of view, when have these people ever done anything that is not in their own interest? jd1950
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree