Landlady wants new live music laws to help pubs

A HEREFORDSHIRE landlady says new live music laws could help pubs that are struggling to remain open.

But Di Franklyn, who runs the Crown Inn at Lea, near Ross-on-Wye, says confusion brought about by the new legislation made attempts at broadening her own licence more difficult.

The Live Music Act was introduced at the beginning of this month (October) with the aim of cutting red tape for venues wishing to host acts performing to no more than 200 people, provided music ends by 11pm.

Di says, however, she has wasted £300 on such an application she did not need.

“We wanted a licence to put on live music because it wasn’t covered by our premises licence,” she said.

“But the new act meant we didn’t need a licence for the live music we had asked for.”

Confusion caused through contact with the council licensing teams led to a heated debate during the local authority’s recent regulatory sub-committee meeting.

But Di, who said she will now attempt to recover the £300 spent in fees, has at least the comfort of the new act which she described as a bonus to businesses.

“Without doing things like music we will not survive,” she added.

“Gone are the days when you open the door and people come in. We have to think what we could offer the community.”

Comments(5)

RogerLFC says...
8:23am Tue 23 Oct 12

Reminds me of a planning application I made to Hereford Council for a house extension a couple of years ago. They cashed my £300 fee then wrote back saying I didn't need planning permission! Council have refused to hand back the money.

bobby47 says...
10:49am Tue 23 Oct 12

Bloody hell. Why do we put up with this constant shovelling of cash into their wide gaping mouths.

FDLicensingLaw says...
1:50pm Tue 23 Oct 12

It is a shame that M(r)s Franklyn didn't take the advice of a licensing lawyer before she made her application to vary her premises licence, as its has been common knowledge for quite a while that the Live Music Act was just around the corner and would lift restrictions on live music for many venues. Any decent licensing lawyer would have told her not to bother, and that would not have cost her £300. I'd have told her for nothing! I do think it is pretty immoral of the council to have kept the money however. Hopefully they will do the decent thing, and give it back.

RogerLFC says...
9:29pm Tue 23 Oct 12

I agree with your well made point FDLicensingLaw . The Council may well be technically correct with their fee but it appears immoral as you say. In my case, when I had some feedback after a moan I made, I was told it was basically my fault for not attending a 'free' planning 'drop in' desk where I could have been given advice about my 'plan' and I would have been told I could build it without permission. That sounds like a very short 5 minute job so quite how the Council still kept my £300 I don't know. This possibly contributes to my low opinion of the Council.

Biomech says...
8:46am Wed 24 Oct 12

It might not of cost her £300, but it should have cost here probably just as much in fees for the legal advice :P

I'll tell you what will save pubs - not costing a fortune. Do they honestly think people will stop drinking at home when some pubs are charging £4.10 a pint!? The last 2 times I've been "out", I've had a great time around friends houses, spent no more than a tenner, not been kicked out for closing and drank copious amounts of beer.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree