CONTROVERSIAL plans to build a new cemetery on public open space in Rowley Regis are finally set to be decided by council chiefs.

Sandwell Council is looking to redevelop 1.6 hectares of space behind homes on Powke Lane into a huge new graveyard with an improved access, office buildings and landscaping.

Planning permission was granted in October last year despite huge opposition from more than 800 residents and wildlife groups, worried about the loss of space and impact on nature.

The plan was withdrawn just two weeks later after concerns were raised by councillors who called for alternative options to be explored.

But the issue is back on the table and members will again be asked to make a decision on whether or not to approve a departure from the authority’s local development plan which designated the site as open green space, to allow the plan to go ahead at a full council meeting on Tuesday (October 15).

Previously, councillors have said that Sandwell is running out of plots in existing facilities, including Rowley Regis Crematorium near the proposed site, and would have to stop accepting new burials within four years.

They said this would result in families having to go to neighbouring authorities and added the new facility would ensure adequate space for 50 years.

But others argued that the authority should be fighting to protect the green space it has and that the open space was much loved and well used by residents.

A report to council said: “The original planning application was publicised by neighbour notification letters, and by press and site notices.

“Twenty-four objections were received including two petitions of objection, one written and one electronic totalling 419 and 392 signatures respectively.

“The applicant proposes to construct a new cemetery including; site remediation, widening of existing access off Powke Lane; office building and operational yard, parking, CCTV, lighting, landscaping and other associated site improvement works on part of Powke Lane Open Space.

“Planning committee are of the opinion that the proposal is satisfactory to justify a departure from that would enhance the area, whilst keeping the majority of public open space unchanged for the enjoyment of the adjacent community, whilst providing a much need service.”